With the Iowa caucuses just around the corner, the polls are indicating Huckabee holding a significant lead over Romney. I forsee Huckabee taking this one down, as Romney has been pumping his campaign in Iowa for quite some time and making little headway. This race for first is obviously important, but perhaps the bigger question is who will finish third?
This graph from pollster shows tight three way race for third between Freddy T, Johnny Mac, and Da Rudy. I think Thompson (and his parabolic polling numbers) is a cooked goose, but this may be his chance for a rebound. Rudy would love to solidify his campaign with an expectations game win by finishing third, which could buoy his campaign through a poor finish in New Hampshire. Johnny Mac could get the biggest bounce with a third place finish, considering he is polling well in New Hampshire. A third here for McCain could very possibly give enough bounce to move ahead of the "loser" between Huckabee and Romney.
Additionally, it looks like Huckabee is in a dead heat nationally with Rudy G. I think this means that if the Huck wins Iowa and finishes above Rudy in New Hampshire -- Florida becomes a MUST WIN for the Rudy camp. Oh how much fun this time of year is....
Friday, December 28, 2007
It's all so complicated...
The Bhutto assassination undoubtedly throws some uncertainty into the Pakistani situation and my comrade Mel-Anon hits home with a great post on the situation.
It is difficult to decipher what this will mean for Pakistan in the long term, but the likely short term implications are Sharif and the opposition parties boycott the January 8th elections -- leading to a status quo government ran by Musharraf. With the US pushing for the election to stay on track to keep the "bad guys" from winning -- we will probably see an "election" that changes little other than giving a new rallying cry for unrest. Overall winner -- whoever likes a destabilized nuclear power situated between Iran, Afghanistan, India and China.
I saw Charlie Wilson's War over the weekend, and have to say that it is pertinent to this topic. Understanding the Soviet-Afghan experience is a must for understanding the current geopolitical situation in Southern/Central Asia.
It is difficult to decipher what this will mean for Pakistan in the long term, but the likely short term implications are Sharif and the opposition parties boycott the January 8th elections -- leading to a status quo government ran by Musharraf. With the US pushing for the election to stay on track to keep the "bad guys" from winning -- we will probably see an "election" that changes little other than giving a new rallying cry for unrest. Overall winner -- whoever likes a destabilized nuclear power situated between Iran, Afghanistan, India and China.
I saw Charlie Wilson's War over the weekend, and have to say that it is pertinent to this topic. Understanding the Soviet-Afghan experience is a must for understanding the current geopolitical situation in Southern/Central Asia.
Labels:
Foreign Policy,
International Politics,
Pakistan
Thursday, December 27, 2007
As apolitical as it gets...
Former Pakistani Prime Minister and current opposition leader Benazir Bhutto
was assassinated on Thursday in Rawalpindi. It is disheartening to see such apolitical actions in a situation that is in desperate need of politics. Somewhere today, Bernard Crick weeps... As do all of us who hold out hope for conciliation, compromise and relatively peaceful transitions of power. I hope that this isn't the spark that sets off an already combustible situation.
was assassinated on Thursday in Rawalpindi. It is disheartening to see such apolitical actions in a situation that is in desperate need of politics. Somewhere today, Bernard Crick weeps... As do all of us who hold out hope for conciliation, compromise and relatively peaceful transitions of power. I hope that this isn't the spark that sets off an already combustible situation.
Labels:
Foreign Policy,
International Politics,
Pakistan
Friday, December 14, 2007
A powerful "O"...
In the previous post, I mentioned how the mainstream media is discounting Oprah's influence... now they are reporting that she has angered and alienated her fans. Somehow I doubt that most of these comments left on her site were from many of her true fans. It also bothers me that those who rely on the free market idea are often the first to jump all over a celebrity for a political endorsement. It is my belief that the basic civic duty of political participation isn't checked at the door when you become a celebrity. If one just throws endorsements around and angers their audience too much... the market will let that person know.
My personal favorite comment on the CNN site:
Damn straight john from Euless (or is it Hillary from Chicago via New England via Arkansas via DC via New York???) -- he will surely loose if elected... Wait if he is elected, wouldn't that mean.... Oh well, I'm confused.
The following comment may offer more insight, but definitely less entertainment (and isn't that what CNN is all about anyway?).
I'm not sure I agree with the idea that other celebs don't take heat as well for their political stands (think Dixie Chicks), but overall some valuable points. I definitely agree with the point on CNN trying to create a story because of some comments on Oprah's website. If this is "news," maybe I could start a group of Internet muckrakers who don't report the news... but make it.
My personal favorite comment on the CNN site:
Obama will loose to the Republican's if he is elected. The only person capable of beating the right-wing machine is Hillary Clinton. You may not like everything about her but we can't afford the Republican party keeping control of this country for another 4-8 years. Come on DEMS!! Don't shoot your own feet off by nominating Obama. He will be eaten alive!!!!!!
Posted By john, Euless, TX : December 13, 2007 7:50 pm
Damn straight john from Euless (or is it Hillary from Chicago via New England via Arkansas via DC via New York???) -- he will surely loose if elected... Wait if he is elected, wouldn't that mean.... Oh well, I'm confused.
The following comment may offer more insight, but definitely less entertainment (and isn't that what CNN is all about anyway?).
Reading too much into things. I really don't think a few comments on Oprah's website is indicative of any type of "backlash". As for her comments, it's obvious a few people are overreacting and seeing a racialized message I seriously doubt is there. I've never cared much for Oprah but I don't think she should be forced to live in a race and politically free bubble just because her fans expect her to. I haven't seen any other celebrities coming under fire for supporting the politicians of their choice. Personally I think this ticker is CNN trying to give attention to an "issue" that isn't an "issue" to begin with.
Posted By Edwin, Chicago IL : December 13, 2007 8:27 pm
I'm not sure I agree with the idea that other celebs don't take heat as well for their political stands (think Dixie Chicks), but overall some valuable points. I definitely agree with the point on CNN trying to create a story because of some comments on Oprah's website. If this is "news," maybe I could start a group of Internet muckrakers who don't report the news... but make it.
Labels:
2008 Election,
Iowa Caucus,
politics
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
The Evolution of Huckabee...
From a back of the pack longshot (I got him at 15 to 1) just a few months ago, he has come on strong and appears to be making headway nationally as well as in Iowa. It appears that it's not just Hawkeyes for Huck anymore...
*You can catch an overview of the recent CNN/Opinion Research national poll(which is the last included in the above graph) at pollster.com. The highlight of the poll is the close proximity of Huckabee to Rudy G. for the national lead. I think the story of the next month (on the GOP side) will be not only how Romney and Huck battle in Iowa, but how Rudy goes after Huck to stave off any momemtum he may gain from (likely?) winning in Iowa. The veracity of Rudy's attacks in the next few weeks could be a tell-tale sign of how much of a threat he sees in Huckabee. I think that with a win in Iowa and a second place finish in New Hampshire, he would make a formidable foe. Of course, with Cali and NY looming early in February - this still may turn out to be a flash in the pan.
** Of additional note on the graph --
1. How about that parabolic curve for Freddy T, where the focus is near the point of announcing his candidancy.
2. Rudy G's noticably fallen off in recent weeks. I haven't seen much in the media about him and it seems his campaign is taking a wait and see attitude with respect to the nomination process -- as in "wait and see how badly we underperform in Iowa and New Hampshire before we do something about it."
3. Romney's failure to climb in the national polls. I was excusing it since it was the "common knowledge" that his national numbers were hurting since he was concentration on the early primary states. After Huck's ascendency, however, I am convinced that Romney cannot win the GOP nomination.
4. Another thought, if Huckabee takes out Romney, but Rudy looks more favorable to win in NY or Cali than Huck... who do the social conservatives move towards? Freddy T. is cooked... so is it back to Johnny Mac? A darkhorse that you just can't count out yet.
5. Ron Paul is interesting, but he has no hope of the GOP nomination.
*** On the Dems side, if you didn't hear already... ok you did... Barack had campaign events with Oprah in three states over the weekend. I was suprised to see the media and the "experts" dismissing this as just another celebrity endorsement that doesn't translate into votes. I'm not going to say that Oprah can win an election on her own, but I definately think her voice carries more weight than Warren Beatty or Bruce Springsteen. Don't get me wrong, I love THE BOSS, but he didn't have access to a daily television audience (cult??) that have created an entire lifestlye via options and choices provided by "O". Seriously, not recognizing the difference of Oprah in comparision to the other celeb endorsements is either a serious miscalculation, intentional attempt to derail her influence or stupidity.
*You can catch an overview of the recent CNN/Opinion Research national poll(which is the last included in the above graph) at pollster.com. The highlight of the poll is the close proximity of Huckabee to Rudy G. for the national lead. I think the story of the next month (on the GOP side) will be not only how Romney and Huck battle in Iowa, but how Rudy goes after Huck to stave off any momemtum he may gain from (likely?) winning in Iowa. The veracity of Rudy's attacks in the next few weeks could be a tell-tale sign of how much of a threat he sees in Huckabee. I think that with a win in Iowa and a second place finish in New Hampshire, he would make a formidable foe. Of course, with Cali and NY looming early in February - this still may turn out to be a flash in the pan.
** Of additional note on the graph --
1. How about that parabolic curve for Freddy T, where the focus is near the point of announcing his candidancy.
2. Rudy G's noticably fallen off in recent weeks. I haven't seen much in the media about him and it seems his campaign is taking a wait and see attitude with respect to the nomination process -- as in "wait and see how badly we underperform in Iowa and New Hampshire before we do something about it."
3. Romney's failure to climb in the national polls. I was excusing it since it was the "common knowledge" that his national numbers were hurting since he was concentration on the early primary states. After Huck's ascendency, however, I am convinced that Romney cannot win the GOP nomination.
4. Another thought, if Huckabee takes out Romney, but Rudy looks more favorable to win in NY or Cali than Huck... who do the social conservatives move towards? Freddy T. is cooked... so is it back to Johnny Mac? A darkhorse that you just can't count out yet.
5. Ron Paul is interesting, but he has no hope of the GOP nomination.
*** On the Dems side, if you didn't hear already... ok you did... Barack had campaign events with Oprah in three states over the weekend. I was suprised to see the media and the "experts" dismissing this as just another celebrity endorsement that doesn't translate into votes. I'm not going to say that Oprah can win an election on her own, but I definately think her voice carries more weight than Warren Beatty or Bruce Springsteen. Don't get me wrong, I love THE BOSS, but he didn't have access to a daily television audience (cult??) that have created an entire lifestlye via options and choices provided by "O". Seriously, not recognizing the difference of Oprah in comparision to the other celeb endorsements is either a serious miscalculation, intentional attempt to derail her influence or stupidity.
Labels:
2008 Election,
Iowa Caucus,
politics
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Homeward Bound...
I am heading off to Southern Indiana for the weekend. I hope to catch up with some old friends during this visit and hopefully avoid snow on the roads.
Things to do:
* Eat at Grandma's [check]- and I enjoyed it more than ever
* Drink a Bud Light [check]- but i didn't enjoy it like I used to.
* See the old gang [half check]
Things not to do:
* Discuss the intricacies of religion [check]- though this was hard.
* Fail to bow at the throne of the high school basketball gods [check] - though i did laugh on the inside about the consternation a 1-2 start was causing
* Order a Sierra Nevada Pale Ale at the local bar - [uncheck]- I asked for a Sierra without thinking about it, and got a really strange look from the Barkeep
* Cajole the old gang into repeating our old shenanigans. [check]- this was mostly safe, since I didn't see the group together.
Have a good weekend. Stay warm and involved.
Things to do:
* Eat at Grandma's [check]- and I enjoyed it more than ever
* Drink a Bud Light [check]- but i didn't enjoy it like I used to.
* See the old gang [half check]
Things not to do:
* Discuss the intricacies of religion [check]- though this was hard.
* Fail to bow at the throne of the high school basketball gods [check] - though i did laugh on the inside about the consternation a 1-2 start was causing
* Order a Sierra Nevada Pale Ale at the local bar - [uncheck]- I asked for a Sierra without thinking about it, and got a really strange look from the Barkeep
* Cajole the old gang into repeating our old shenanigans. [check]- this was mostly safe, since I didn't see the group together.
Have a good weekend. Stay warm and involved.
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
localvore, locatarian, or locavore...
The Oxford American dictionary has announced it's 2007 word of the year is locavore. This is one, and the preferred iteration by me, of the numerous terms used to describe the movement towards local sustainable and organic food stuffs. The movement is comprised of a variety of groups such as, environmentalists, hippies, gastronomes, yuppies and me [I may fit into none, some or all of these categories].
This is one of those issues that I feel the need to shamelessly plug from time to time. I hope this publicity will bring some more people into a state of awareness of what wonderful food is being grown and provided for right in your region. There are numerous depressing facts and rationales for partaking in local foodstuffs whenever possible, but to me it started with the quality/taste of the food. If the movement focuses on this and works on spreading the environmental message as a bonus point - it just might work out. The economics argument is also becoming more of an argument as gas prices remain high.
I honestly believe, that with a slight alteration of expectation - as in recognizing that most products are seasonal in nature - and a slight increase in time spent handling and cooking food the concept of being a locavore may be able to actually put a dent in the farming-industrial complex created by our federal government's policies. Of course, I do fear the self righteous amongst us will invariably become frustrated by the folks like me who want to make this a legitimate option for all and not merely an elitist "I feel better" activity. More info available here, from a group that doesn't seem to be too militant.
-- Though I am intimately involved in this local food lifestyle, my choice for word/phrase of the year would have been: "An aura of invincibility" - Definition: The term invented by the Clinton campaign/media/Karl Rove to describe the hope/dream that nobody can possibly contest Hillary for the Democratic nomination.
This is one of those issues that I feel the need to shamelessly plug from time to time. I hope this publicity will bring some more people into a state of awareness of what wonderful food is being grown and provided for right in your region. There are numerous depressing facts and rationales for partaking in local foodstuffs whenever possible, but to me it started with the quality/taste of the food. If the movement focuses on this and works on spreading the environmental message as a bonus point - it just might work out. The economics argument is also becoming more of an argument as gas prices remain high.
I honestly believe, that with a slight alteration of expectation - as in recognizing that most products are seasonal in nature - and a slight increase in time spent handling and cooking food the concept of being a locavore may be able to actually put a dent in the farming-industrial complex created by our federal government's policies. Of course, I do fear the self righteous amongst us will invariably become frustrated by the folks like me who want to make this a legitimate option for all and not merely an elitist "I feel better" activity. More info available here, from a group that doesn't seem to be too militant.
-- Though I am intimately involved in this local food lifestyle, my choice for word/phrase of the year would have been: "An aura of invincibility" - Definition: The term invented by the Clinton campaign/media/Karl Rove to describe the hope/dream that nobody can possibly contest Hillary for the Democratic nomination.
Monday, November 26, 2007
The haves and the have-mores...
I guess this shouldn't come as a surprise, but given the success rate of these self-financed candidates it may just be an early sign of concern for the GOP.
In other news, or at least some elementary non-probabilistic horse race journalism, it looks like any Republican is out polling HRC.
Of course, how much this poll shows us - given the non-random self selecting sample -is in question. What isn't in question is how lackluster a lot of these names are. To think 2008 is the first open race in ages and the most dynamic match up would be between a former Arkansas governor from Hope and a Clinton. Sheesh.
In other news, or at least some elementary non-probabilistic horse race journalism, it looks like any Republican is out polling HRC.
National General Election Match-ups:
Huckabee 44%, Clinton 39%
Thompson 44%, Clinton 40%
McCain 42%, Clinton 38%
Giuliani 43%, Clinton 40%
Romney 43%, Clinton 40%
Obama 47%, Thompson 40%
Obama 45%, McCain 38%
Obama 46%, Huckabee 40%
Obama 46%, Romney 40%
Obama 46%, Giuliani 41%
Edwards 45%, Thompson 42%
Edwards 44%, Romney 42%
Edwards 44%, Giuliani 43%
Edwards 43%, Huckabee 42%
Edwards 42%, McCain 42%
Of course, how much this poll shows us - given the non-random self selecting sample -is in question. What isn't in question is how lackluster a lot of these names are. To think 2008 is the first open race in ages and the most dynamic match up would be between a former Arkansas governor from Hope and a Clinton. Sheesh.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Hawkeyes for Hillary?
Hillary has the lead, but can she hold off an improving Obama. Oh wait did I say she has the lead... here comes Obama. I also don't think it wise to count Edwards out of this race yet, considering his performance in 2004. A three horse race, with a big dark governor pony coming up from behind. Richardson, the pony, could benefit from the three leaders beating each other up, but I wouldn't hold my breath. This one will come down to the last week, I think mostly because that is just how Iowans do it*. Look at that positive slope for Big O, if I were in Hill's camp I would be secretly campaigning in Florida to make sure to stop the bleeding if a loss occurs in either NH or Iowa.
(*ASIDE: Did you ever wonder if this Iowa Caucus thing is a big conspiracy to keep interest? Doesn't it seem like there are at least three surprises in every race to win Iowa. This of course excepts Harkin's '92 bid.)
Labels:
2008 Election,
Iowa Caucus,
politics
A backpedaling Texan...
There are few things funnier than a cowboy that can't bring the heat. Looks like Mr. T. Boone can't keep his word, and is backing out of the original deal...
* Don't you really just want to call the Jay Rosser on the bottom of that letter? I think I just might do that later.
Hawkeyes for Huckabee...
The most recent polling data from pollster shows some interesting trends in the Iowa GOP caucus. The most interesting trend to me has been the surge of Mike Huckabee into a solid second place behind Romney. Of course, with the recent Club for Growth attacks - it just may be that the Huck is ready for his "deceleration point" to occur. This deceleration point can be noted in the trend lines of Rudy, McCain and especially F. Thompson. This is an interesting phenomenon, especially when all the major players except Romney and Huck have experienced this effect already. The key to note here is that it appears that Romney's support is beginning to clump around the high twenties... could this be the beginning of the deceleration? Could Huckabee's continued growth in support in Iowa be enough to win by ten points, and then go on to carry the nomination? Could an Arkansas governor be pitted against a Clinton for the White House? Just maybe.
Labels:
2008 Election,
Iowa Caucus,
politics
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
New Review at Critical Donkey...
A review (of sorts) of the Hitchens book, god is not Great has been posted at Critical Donkey... Enjoy!
A mirage in Atlanta...
Droughts and water shortages are serious issues that will continue to face America (and the world) as the population expands, pollution increases, and the geographic concentration of the population refocuses on less naturally hydro rich regions. Water rights issues have already become key for southwestern and southeastern states, and with continued counter-intuitive land and water use polices, will probably not go away anytime soon. The current drought sweeping the southeast should be a warning sign for policymakers that relying on "normal" rainfall to sustain water use policies is inherently flawed and shortsighted. By definition, "normal" will not always be achieved. In addition, I doubt many climatologists would feel comfortable taking a strong stand on what normal will be for the next fifty years - given the current environmental uncertainties due to climate change. Of course, sound policy isn't needed as long as you believe in miracles.
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Truth on Taxes...
Informed greatly by Mr. Leonhardt and his column from last week, Plain Truth About Taxes and Cuts, which lays out five basic truths that are often considered debatable with regard to taxes. These five can be summarized as: the affluent are paying a higher share of the taxes, this is because they are making more money – not due to increased rates, corporate tax rates are falling, the total tax burden is relatively stable over time, and the budget deficit is a bigger issue than either party wants to admit.
I am an admitted fiscal policy nerd, but this one nearly made me weep with its’ candid portrait of America’s fiscal position and condition. We can accept these truths and move forward or we can continue to haggle over how to define the debate, while making no progress in securing our nation’s fiscal health. The big hitter of the group of truths is, of course, #5 – the budget deficit. The current official projections show some hope, but are based on unsteady ground. They assume most likely unattainable revenue projections, with relatively modest expenditure planning (i.e. not continually spending billions per week in foreign wars). Not to mention the potential huge shortfall in revenues when Congress (and rightfully so) amends the alternative minimum tax (AMT) to affect fewer middle class families again or the revenue shortfall if not all of the Bush tax cuts are rolled back as current assumptions include.
So what are we to do? Well, if you know anything about basic economics - not the fancy kind, but the kind you run your house on – then you know there are two options out of these situations: Raise revenues or lower expenses. Raising revenues can come through an overall increase in tax rates, a heightened rate on the affluent, or expanding the tax base. Expanding the base sounds the best, but basing a recovery strategy only on continued expansion is asking for failure when this growth rate is not met. I think the best path forward is an across the board rate increase – in a progressive manner (i.e. affluent folks rate increases more) – combined with an increase in the standard deductions and personal exemptions. Another helpful revenue booster and policy simplifier would be to eliminate or greatly reduce (through phase outs) the use of itemized deductions, which incentivize certain behavior.
Another option of course is cutting expenses, which is never easy nor politically palatable. One area that could definitely use some attention is the costs of the Medicare system. I just hope my fellow young voters can recognize the importance of fiscal responsibility as we continue down the path of globalization – which means more competition from developing (quickly) nations (e.g. China).
I am an admitted fiscal policy nerd, but this one nearly made me weep with its’ candid portrait of America’s fiscal position and condition. We can accept these truths and move forward or we can continue to haggle over how to define the debate, while making no progress in securing our nation’s fiscal health. The big hitter of the group of truths is, of course, #5 – the budget deficit. The current official projections show some hope, but are based on unsteady ground. They assume most likely unattainable revenue projections, with relatively modest expenditure planning (i.e. not continually spending billions per week in foreign wars). Not to mention the potential huge shortfall in revenues when Congress (and rightfully so) amends the alternative minimum tax (AMT) to affect fewer middle class families again or the revenue shortfall if not all of the Bush tax cuts are rolled back as current assumptions include.
So what are we to do? Well, if you know anything about basic economics - not the fancy kind, but the kind you run your house on – then you know there are two options out of these situations: Raise revenues or lower expenses. Raising revenues can come through an overall increase in tax rates, a heightened rate on the affluent, or expanding the tax base. Expanding the base sounds the best, but basing a recovery strategy only on continued expansion is asking for failure when this growth rate is not met. I think the best path forward is an across the board rate increase – in a progressive manner (i.e. affluent folks rate increases more) – combined with an increase in the standard deductions and personal exemptions. Another helpful revenue booster and policy simplifier would be to eliminate or greatly reduce (through phase outs) the use of itemized deductions, which incentivize certain behavior.
Another option of course is cutting expenses, which is never easy nor politically palatable. One area that could definitely use some attention is the costs of the Medicare system. I just hope my fellow young voters can recognize the importance of fiscal responsibility as we continue down the path of globalization – which means more competition from developing (quickly) nations (e.g. China).
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
The only thing that is constant... Change
One of the most important values espoused in liberal democracies is the rule of law, which in arguably its’ most important role regulates change within a nation. These changes include how new laws are made through an inclusive legislative process, a fair schedule of elections, smooth transitions of power, and any other significant shift that may inherently seem unstable. This stability of a nation-state during times of change is an important part of global security, because it is a truism to say that nations will at some point change – when they do so, it is preferable that these changes do not result in a power struggle between various factions. If this were to happen, progress would be a very difficult sell, since when something changes the nation would devolve into a power vacuum where all advances in the rule of law are lost to the rule of force.
Unfortunately, this is the instant case in Pakistan today. A general, who six months ago was talked of as a modernizing friend, has gone on a power grabbing spree - banning the supreme court, exercising martial law, and "delaying elections". This is all in the name of stability of course, but the end result of this current action will not be a long term viable and stable Pakistan. There are now far too many disenchanted parties. The religious fundamentalists think the government is held up by the Western infidels. The opposition parties see the cancellation of elections as a sure fire method of keeping them out of government. Perhaps the most disturbing, is the intellectual elites (e.g. lawyers, doctors) abandoning any tacit support previously given to the administration.
With these groups opposed to the current administration, a change is undeniable. The question is what will the change be, how long will it take, and from a very chauvinistic point of view - how will the new leaders view America? I would have said 2 months ago that change was coming, but that there was a greater than 60% chance that it would work out well for America. Today, the odds of getting a stable and friendly regime/administration in Pakistan have fallen to less than 50/50... maybe even to 40%. Once again the realpolitik rationale of "an enemy of an enemy is a friend" may have made a bigger and scarier new enemy. We shall see, but keep your eyes on this area -- It is going to be huge.
Unfortunately, this is the instant case in Pakistan today. A general, who six months ago was talked of as a modernizing friend, has gone on a power grabbing spree - banning the supreme court, exercising martial law, and "delaying elections". This is all in the name of stability of course, but the end result of this current action will not be a long term viable and stable Pakistan. There are now far too many disenchanted parties. The religious fundamentalists think the government is held up by the Western infidels. The opposition parties see the cancellation of elections as a sure fire method of keeping them out of government. Perhaps the most disturbing, is the intellectual elites (e.g. lawyers, doctors) abandoning any tacit support previously given to the administration.
With these groups opposed to the current administration, a change is undeniable. The question is what will the change be, how long will it take, and from a very chauvinistic point of view - how will the new leaders view America? I would have said 2 months ago that change was coming, but that there was a greater than 60% chance that it would work out well for America. Today, the odds of getting a stable and friendly regime/administration in Pakistan have fallen to less than 50/50... maybe even to 40%. Once again the realpolitik rationale of "an enemy of an enemy is a friend" may have made a bigger and scarier new enemy. We shall see, but keep your eyes on this area -- It is going to be huge.
Labels:
Foreign Policy,
International Politics,
Pakistan
Monday, November 5, 2007
A new progressive era --- seriously...
Mother Jones features an article on the potential of a new progressive era that is worth the time to read. I found the most interesting portion to be the section on the demographic change occuring in America along geographical and ethnic lines. These changes are, in and of themselves, interesting, but when viewed through the lens of an increasing population of Latino voters they become the focal point of any electoral calculus over the next twenty to fifty years. The Latino vote showed a significant change from 2004 to 2006, with the gap between Democratic and Republican votes growing by 24%. The article points out that the Immigration debate may end up being the death of the conservative surge since 1980. We shall see. My biggest fear is that neither side will actually work to address this issue and our xenophobia will continue until we have 25% of the population very disenchanted and disenfranchised by these policies.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
What's for Dinner?
An excellent article in this week’s Isthmus discusses the concept of sustainable food production and consumption from a pragmatic perspective. I have become entranced by this issue since moving to Madison and its wonderful Capitol Square Farmer’s Market with a bounty of locally grown produce, meat, and cheese. I used to be a bit on the skeptical side with anything “organic” or “sustainable,” but I have realized that I had let the hard liners spoil the underlying value of the concept.
The idea that I can purchase my produce directly from the person responsible for growing it is a good thing for a number of reasons. Increased consumer confidence, lowered usage of fossil fuels for shipping, fresher is often healthier, and supporting the local economy are some of the keys to the concept. Of course, being the food snob I am, the key to my conversion lies in the quality of the product. The San Marzano tomatoes I get from a local organic vendor in July are absolutely incredible.
If you are at all interested in this topic, I would recommend a quick read of the article. I am interested in a method of measuring local consumption... by weight, meal, cost, mile... so many variables, I would have to love it.
Also, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle may be worth the time as well.
The idea that I can purchase my produce directly from the person responsible for growing it is a good thing for a number of reasons. Increased consumer confidence, lowered usage of fossil fuels for shipping, fresher is often healthier, and supporting the local economy are some of the keys to the concept. Of course, being the food snob I am, the key to my conversion lies in the quality of the product. The San Marzano tomatoes I get from a local organic vendor in July are absolutely incredible.
If you are at all interested in this topic, I would recommend a quick read of the article. I am interested in a method of measuring local consumption... by weight, meal, cost, mile... so many variables, I would have to love it.
Also, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle may be worth the time as well.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
SCHIP and Income Limits -- A Fair Debate?
President Bush’s recent veto of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) passed by Congress has raised considerable debate regarding the role of government in providing health care generally, and the income threshold at which a family is eligible specifically. I speculate that there is will be no simple method for establishing a bright line test on the income threshold issue, but I do believe that there is a common misconception of the value of an annual salary at set point x. There are a number of possible reasons for this disconnect between the way a salary is portrayed in daily discussions and what that salary will actually purchase for a family of four. The most obvious reason for the failure of the debate to focus on the actual purchasing power is that those in the debate, by and large, are not exactly in the $40K-$83K income bracket. A second potential disconnect lies in the aging population and the fact that older citizens tend to be more involved in the political discourse. These older folks also invariably remember when you could buy everything for a nickel, or at most a dollar… In all seriousness, even if these folks have some grasp of inflation and its role in the economy – they could be caught up in the absolute dollar changes as we progress into territory where 2.5% inflation per year is equal to seemingly significant amounts in absolute dollar amounts.
Here is a very generic listing of expenses that I think are reasonable for a family of four...
Housing:
$10,752 for house payment (150K house, 7%, w/ 10% down)
$4,500 for property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and improvements
Transportation:
$3,804 car payment ($20K new car, 60 mths, 7%, 20% down)
$540 one monthly bus pass
$1,600 maintenance, fees, registration, repairs, and insurance
$2,037 in gas (27 miles a gallon, 20K miles a year, $2.75/Gal)
Operations:
$1,000 Gas and Heat
$720 Phones – 2x Cells no home line
$500 Computer – Internet and maintenance
$300 Water and Sewage
$1,600 Clothing
$6,552 Food – 4,368 meals / year at $1.50 per meal
$1,500 Health durables, hair apts, general supplies
$1,600 Entertainment - gifts, toys, movies, dinner
$2,000 College Fund - $1K for each child
$800 School Supplies and fees
$2,000 Additional savings
$2,664 Student Loan payments – 10 yr, 6%, 20K
Total Expenses: $44,469
If you claim savings is not necessary: $40,469
Scenario Analysis:
200% poverty line: Salary: $40,000 – After FICA/Med and Tax Credit: $36,220
250% poverty line: Salary: $50,000 – After FICA/Med and Tax: $43,705
300% poverty line: Salary: $60,000 – After FICA/Med and Tax: $51,190
Income Statement:
$36,220 - $44,469 = ($8,249)
$43,705 - $44,469 = ($764)
$51,190 – $44,469 = $6,721
I don’t believe that this scenario analysis proves that a $60K salary is not enough to get by, but I do believe it may put into perspective just how quickly expenses pile up… Finding health insurance for a family of four in the private market for $560 a month is difficult, if not impossible. Don’t forget, this model family does not have resource consuming vices of alcohol, tobacco, or credit card fees. This analysis also fails to consider the potential for large unbudgeted expenses and features what I feel is a rather frugal lifestyle. Consider that adjusted for inflation a $30K salary in 1980 would be roughly equivalent to an $80K salary in 2006. I was not alive in 1980, so I can’t speak to what $30K was like then, but I speculate that it was not perceived to be as much as $80K is now. Also, it is important to note that health care costs, and thus health insurance, have risen at rates that far exceed inflation.
Here is a very generic listing of expenses that I think are reasonable for a family of four...
Housing:
$10,752 for house payment (150K house, 7%, w/ 10% down)
$4,500 for property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and improvements
Transportation:
$3,804 car payment ($20K new car, 60 mths, 7%, 20% down)
$540 one monthly bus pass
$1,600 maintenance, fees, registration, repairs, and insurance
$2,037 in gas (27 miles a gallon, 20K miles a year, $2.75/Gal)
Operations:
$1,000 Gas and Heat
$720 Phones – 2x Cells no home line
$500 Computer – Internet and maintenance
$300 Water and Sewage
$1,600 Clothing
$6,552 Food – 4,368 meals / year at $1.50 per meal
$1,500 Health durables, hair apts, general supplies
$1,600 Entertainment - gifts, toys, movies, dinner
$2,000 College Fund - $1K for each child
$800 School Supplies and fees
$2,000 Additional savings
$2,664 Student Loan payments – 10 yr, 6%, 20K
Total Expenses: $44,469
If you claim savings is not necessary: $40,469
Scenario Analysis:
200% poverty line: Salary: $40,000 – After FICA/Med and Tax Credit: $36,220
250% poverty line: Salary: $50,000 – After FICA/Med and Tax: $43,705
300% poverty line: Salary: $60,000 – After FICA/Med and Tax: $51,190
Income Statement:
$36,220 - $44,469 = ($8,249)
$43,705 - $44,469 = ($764)
$51,190 – $44,469 = $6,721
I don’t believe that this scenario analysis proves that a $60K salary is not enough to get by, but I do believe it may put into perspective just how quickly expenses pile up… Finding health insurance for a family of four in the private market for $560 a month is difficult, if not impossible. Don’t forget, this model family does not have resource consuming vices of alcohol, tobacco, or credit card fees. This analysis also fails to consider the potential for large unbudgeted expenses and features what I feel is a rather frugal lifestyle. Consider that adjusted for inflation a $30K salary in 1980 would be roughly equivalent to an $80K salary in 2006. I was not alive in 1980, so I can’t speak to what $30K was like then, but I speculate that it was not perceived to be as much as $80K is now. Also, it is important to note that health care costs, and thus health insurance, have risen at rates that far exceed inflation.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Hitchens speech reviewed at Critical Donkey...
I have made my initial post at Critical Donkey. It is a long-winded review of the Hitchens speech I saw this past weekend, and is the precursor to a full review of his most recent book: god is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Behind the Times is On the Go...
Initial Post has been made to my Donkey Behind the Times blog... This one will hopefully be a 1-3 times weekly affair, limited to about 300-400 words per post, and focusing on a Friedman, Krugman, and/or other Op-Ed piece from THE NEW YORK TIMES.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Just begin already.
Since my return from my Napa wedding in August, I have been continually telling myself that I was going to start a series of blogs here at Blogger and make a valiant effort to apply myself to consistently publishing material on each. Well, after more than a month of procrastination and consternation, I am beginning officially today. I was hesitant at first to start without a well thought out piece, but given the probability (or lack thereof) of me producing a solid piece of written work before next year, I thought it best to get the show on the road -- or net. A more detailed introduction to each of the am Donkey blogs will be published over the next week, but the general idea behind each is:
Donkey Behind the Times - The plan here is for me to read a Freidman, Krugman, and possibly one other op-ed piece each week. I will then try to write my thoughts on each, hopefully adding another perspective and some extension from the editorial.
Cards Donkey - Poker and Sports. Focusing on the St. Louis Cardinals, NFL football, and NCAA basketball and football.
Critical Donkey - I plan to offer up less than great reviews of film, books, and music... We will see how long I can keep up with my current reading list. On the block for sure are Hitchens, Obama, and Freidman.
And the home ship am Donkey will focus on whatever else is out there. Mostly politics I'm sure.
Donkey Behind the Times - The plan here is for me to read a Freidman, Krugman, and possibly one other op-ed piece each week. I will then try to write my thoughts on each, hopefully adding another perspective and some extension from the editorial.
Cards Donkey - Poker and Sports. Focusing on the St. Louis Cardinals, NFL football, and NCAA basketball and football.
Critical Donkey - I plan to offer up less than great reviews of film, books, and music... We will see how long I can keep up with my current reading list. On the block for sure are Hitchens, Obama, and Freidman.
And the home ship am Donkey will focus on whatever else is out there. Mostly politics I'm sure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)